Why Does W1 Seems Unintelligible?

In many instances, the W1 models that science provides contradict our evolutionary common sense.
We observe W1 events in time and space from our unique perspectives. We also have limited memory and computational power. We deal with a certain scale of W1 physical phenomena.
The main reason that we need to lower standard of intelligibility is that the laws of W1 are different from the laws of W2. We make a W2 model of what is happening in W1 (with the help of our unique W1 body hardware). W2 models are correlating with W1 events, yet many things in W1 contradict the cohesion of W2 laws and W2 models. Our W2 models or images are different in kind and degree from W1 events. They are, at best, inaccurate and speculative. We need to lower our standards of intelligibility as physics discovers how W1 realm works.
Despite such fundamental unintelligiblity, our biggest problems lie somewhere else. Most people imagine things that cannot exist in W1. They, I nstead of updating L2 accurately according to W1, prefer improbable or impossible L3 and L1 images and laws.

A Currency That Measures W3 Qualitative Experiences Is Needed

In capitalism, W1 events and compositions are introduced  as the ultimate goals for happiness. But in reality, the ultimate goal lies in W3. Possession and control in W1 is needed to some degrees, but there are many other ways to serve the feeler.
Moreover, money is not an efficient currency to achieve maximum W3 experiences for masses. It does not measure and take into account W3 experiences. We need a socioeconomic system that can guage people’s feelings and their beautiful qualitative experiences. The use of new technologies can facilitate such thing.