How Much Inequality Is Justified In a Society?

W1 preferences could be money and other W1 resources.
W2 preferences could be education.
W3 preferences are happiness and qualitative meaningful experiences.
Is there an accepted mathematical relationship between the relative fulfillment of W1, W2, W3 preferences among the members of a society. For instance, how much inequality in wealth is acceptable? How much disparity in opportunity for education (and education) is justified? How fair is the distribution of happiness?
Some primitive tribes could not bear more than 50 times inequity in wealth. That much inequity was a threshold that could trigger invasion, confiscation, expropriation, murder, and so on. However, it seems the modern society (which has created the greatest wealth gap in history) has found some justifications to suppress people’s instinctive desires for equality.

Nez believes that inequality and inequity beyond certain ratios are ugly. Nezman tries to establish a society that distribution of W1 and W2 resources can provide the highest qualitative experiences for masses.

Depression: Attitude Toward the Future

Everyone wants entertainment and novelty, and nobody can entertain you better than yourself. You can do that with limited amount of W1 resources and great deal of imagination.
The W1 materialization always lags behind imagination. You can make the future beautiful as much as your imagination allows you. Your concocted Le-4 and Le-5 scenarios of future is your attitude toward future. If they are built on a firm L2 foundations, they  have more chance of future success. You can conquer the future with your beautiful L2- based imagination. This is the attitude of success.
On the contrary, depression is caused by lack of moving and evolving imagination about the future. In fact, some Le-4 and ale-5 scenarios of future (rooted on some L1 or L3 lenses) have conquered the depressed’s imagination about the future.

The Era of a Primitive Selfishness Is Ending

The feeler's feeling is the only source of value, and the current socioeconomic system should be transformed dramatically in order to value W3 experiences. By advent of new technologies, W3 experiences will become measurable, and understanding about the priority of W3 experiences would overhaul our socioeconomic system.
The era of primitive selfishness will end and a new and more beautiful selfishness will replace it.
Selfishness is a primitive instinct that serves as a valuable and adaptive trait for survival. The selfish managed to survive and pass their genes to their offsprings. We are all descendants of the most selfish. It is no surprise that taping into the pursuit of self-interest was easy and could be utilized to turn the wheels of capitalism.
However, the primitive selfishness is losing its beauty as people are becoming self-aware and empathetic. One day, vicarious or immersive pleasures (of seeing happiness in the eyes and faces of others) will become as important as selfish pleasures.
Primitive selfishness only cares about survival and care of the self and offsprings, but empathetic selfishness has a wider circle of care. It values the preferences of others as well.
Awareness and empathy take Nezman beyond the boundaries of primitive and instinctive preferences. Nezman has a new mathematics of selfishness that values the preferences of others.